The problem is that your question also isn't very helpful. Voilà! Better low-light performance! See how easy it is for someone else to spend your money for you? The answer to your question is simple and not very helpful: Get a FF D4 or 1Dx with f1.4 primes and f2.8 stabilized zooms. A lot of well-paid work got done with those cameras then, and most of them are still in use by professionals today.
Aps c sensor vs micro four thirds pro#
You might find it interesting to know that today's m43 cameras with "tiny" sensors and "awful" image quality are roughly equal to the top-of-the-line pro cameras from just five years ago that cost $8,000 and that the people who are now scoffing lusted after. I know faster glass will help, but will the investment in glass be worth it when the sensor on the G2 is "ancient technology"? I'm really a novice in this field (mft), but I currently have a Lumix G2, and am trying to decide what will give better low light performance, faster lens/es, newer camera body (GX7 G6 ), both, camera body and lens/es, or moving up to a completely larger sensor? I could not find any general advantage in more even sharpness across the frame on the m43 lenses in these lenses based on those tests. The lenses I looked at was the FF Nikon 28 1.8 vs the Oly m43 17 1.8, the FF Nikon 50 1.4G vs the Pana m43 25 1.4 and the FF Nikon 24-70 2.8 at 24mm vs the Pana 12-35 2.8 at 12 mm. Just took a quick look at photo zone and a few lenses (there is a debate how you could or could not compare the actual resolution numbers across formats, but the relative corner performance is not influenced by that). But it is doubtful on the smaller m43 lenses. Pretty much the reason Nikon went with a lower pixel density on the Df lots of that pristine legacy glass won't hold up at 36MP.Ī 36 mp FF D800 dont stress lenses more than a 16 mp APS-C and less than a 16 mp M43.Īs for better corner performance, as in more even sharpness across the frame, in general on m43, it might be true for the original 4/3 with the tele centric and relative large lenses. And lots of sports shooters don't really care when shooting with a long tele and isolating your subject, a bit of corner softness and light falloff helps.Ĭamera's like the D800 (and I assume the new Sony) really push glass what looked great at 12MP doesn't always look great at 36MP. Just like the m43 glass, lots aren't, especially wide open. They must have all sorts of issues I guess. I wonder how pro sports, landscape and wildlife shooters get on with images that are not sharp across the entire photo with their FF cameras.
0 kommentar(er)
